Quite overwhelmed with all my work, but I've managed to pull through with the proposal and getting the WBS, draft timeline, and budget done. Ended up slacking off on Human Factors and Reading for Ideas in order to get those two accomplished for the week.
Barbara and Amy switched roles, which I am quite happy with. The more I started working with the two of them on the proposal, I began to feel like Barbara would be a great Content Editor and Amy would be great at Information Architecture since she is more artistic her Design skills will be really useful.
Hopefully next week will be less stressful. I feel like I got a lot of work done ahead of time with doing a lot of work on the timeline and budget. However, we do have the Gantt chart due in Project Management which will take a while.
The one thing I am a little worried about is that Kristoffer picked on our group hardcore during our proposal critique without making much mention of the Sparke group's sketchy wording, grammar, and design. I feel like he pushed us away from what we were doing, but gave us very little idea of what would be better. It was really a critique of "This is good and this is bad" without any "what would be better."
Luckily, Ivan was there as usual to clarify things for us and get us rolling in a good direction. I have heard from anonymous sources that Kristoffer tends to pick one group and give them considerably more criticism and attention than other groups over the course of the semester. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing I am not sure. I like the attention, but I don't appreciate the harsh criticism without suggestion of what would be better. I understand that Kristoffer wants to be somewhat vague so as to leave the creativity up to the group, but I feel that it is better to generate options and let us run with them than do nothing and leave the group frustrated and confused.
Well, I'm out of time. Hope that covers enough. I'm confident in the project. i will succeed.